hey nico,
although you probably prefer not to confirm or deny some of your skills have been applied to joomla.org. Upon taking a closer look i have noticed some functions (which seem to have your name on them) being used by that site. Thats gotta tell users something. :)
On J1.6, for those among us who believe its a stable enough release to be considered "stable" and rush to the shelves to get it going for fear of being left behind, consider this. If it were so, for what reason would joomla.org themselves not be running it but rather leaving it for community testing, which i have no problem with, after all that one benefit of open source, however FOR FU%$ SAKE dont call it stable without leading by example.
thoughts?
although you probably prefer not to confirm or deny some of your skills have been applied to joomla.org. Upon taking a closer look i have noticed some functions (which seem to have your name on them) being used by that site. Thats gotta tell users something. :)
On J1.6, for those among us who believe its a stable enough release to be considered "stable" and rush to the shelves to get it going for fear of being left behind, consider this. If it were so, for what reason would joomla.org themselves not be running it but rather leaving it for community testing, which i have no problem with, after all that one benefit of open source, however FOR FU%$ SAKE dont call it stable without leading by example.
thoughts?
